Talk:Stendhal graphics copyright: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Content deleted Content added
imported>Herodot Is the gpl the right licence for images? |
imported>GreyKnight No edit summary |
||
| Line 5: | Line 5: | ||
I'm not sure about those legal things so correct me if I'm wrong. I think the gpl is not applicabe to graphics and they should be licenced with the GNU FDL as shown on the bottom of this page. |
I'm not sure about those legal things so correct me if I'm wrong. I think the gpl is not applicabe to graphics and they should be licenced with the GNU FDL as shown on the bottom of this page. |
||
:GFDL is more appropriate than GPL for images. Other licenses of note include the [http://artlibre.org/licence/lal/en/ Free Art License], any of several listed on [http://creativecommons.org/about/licenses/ Creative Commons], and of course good ol' public domain. --[[User:GreyKnight|GreyKnight]] 10:25, 16 September 2006 (PDT) |
|||
Revision as of 17:25, 16 September 2006
--MiguelAngelBlanchLardin 02:47, 3 May 2006 (PDT)
I think most of the GFX used is released to the public domain. We need to either verify it is free to use ( as Charas characters are ) or ask them to allow free usage of the charasets.
Is the gpl the right licence for images?
I'm not sure about those legal things so correct me if I'm wrong. I think the gpl is not applicabe to graphics and they should be licenced with the GNU FDL as shown on the bottom of this page.
- GFDL is more appropriate than GPL for images. Other licenses of note include the Free Art License, any of several listed on Creative Commons, and of course good ol' public domain. --GreyKnight 10:25, 16 September 2006 (PDT)