Talk:Stendhal graphics copyright: Difference between revisions

From Arianne
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Content deleted Content added
imported>MiguelAngelBlanchLardin
No edit summary
imported>Herodot
Is the gpl the right licence for images?
Line 1: Line 1:
--[[User:MiguelAngelBlanchLardin|MiguelAngelBlanchLardin]] 02:47, 3 May 2006 (PDT)<br>
--[[User:MiguelAngelBlanchLardin|MiguelAngelBlanchLardin]] 02:47, 3 May 2006 (PDT)<br>
I think most of the GFX used is released to the public domain. We need to either verify it is free to use ( as Charas characters are ) or ask them to allow free usage of the charasets.
I think most of the GFX used is released to the public domain. We need to either verify it is free to use ( as Charas characters are ) or ask them to allow free usage of the charasets.

== Is the gpl the right licence for images? ==

I'm not sure about those legal things so correct me if I'm wrong. I think the gpl is not applicabe to graphics and they should be licenced with the GNU FDL as shown on the bottom of this page.

Revision as of 13:44, 16 September 2006

--MiguelAngelBlanchLardin 02:47, 3 May 2006 (PDT)
I think most of the GFX used is released to the public domain. We need to either verify it is free to use ( as Charas characters are ) or ask them to allow free usage of the charasets.

Is the gpl the right licence for images?

I'm not sure about those legal things so correct me if I'm wrong. I think the gpl is not applicabe to graphics and they should be licenced with the GNU FDL as shown on the bottom of this page.