Fixing RP Score 2011: Difference between revisions

Jump to navigation Jump to search
Content deleted Content added
imported>Hendrik Brummermann
No edit summary
imported>Hendrik Brummermann
No edit summary
Line 1: Line 1:
[[Image:Score_rprank.png|thumb|comparing old and suggested rp scores]]
[[Image:Score_rprank.png|thumb|comparing old and suggested rp scores]]
In February 2011 we [http://arianne.sourceforge.net/news/stendhal-0-92-achievements-and-expedition-groups.html added achievements to Stendhal] in order to encourage players to have a far richer playing experience than just killing monsters. This has really worked out great with - at the time of writing - over 12000 achievements granted. Feedback from players has been very positive and many players have discovered aspects of Stendhal that they did not pay attention to.
In February 2011 we [http://arianne.sourceforge.net/news/stendhal-0-92-achievements-and-expedition-groups.html added achievements to Stendhal] in order to encourage players to have a far richer playing experience than just killing monsters. This has really worked out great with - at the time of writing - over 12000 achievements granted. Feedback from players has been very positive and many players have discovered aspects of Stendhal that they did not pay attention to in the past.


In March we [http://stendhalgame.org/news/improvements-to-hall-of-fame-65.html improved the hall of fame] to take the achievement score into account for the best player calculation. After some initial struggling because it caused some players to temporary drop out of the top 10, this did work fine (except for rounding errors), too. But here we introduced a bug. The ranking itself is fine, but the score is not.
In March we [http://stendhalgame.org/news/improvements-to-hall-of-fame-65.html improved the hall of fame] to take the achievement score into account for the best player calculation. After some initial struggling because it caused some players to temporary drop out of the top 10, this did work fine, too. But here we introduced a bug. The ranking itself is fine (except for rounding errors), but the score is not.