Stendhal FAQ: Difference between revisions

Jump to navigation Jump to search
Content deleted Content added
imported>Oslsachem
Uncategorised: Added new AQs (The missing letter is intentional :) )
imported>Oslsachem
Line 318: Line 318:
: Double click on stendhal-0.83.jar or type java -jar stendhal-0.83.jar on a command window.
: Double click on stendhal-0.83.jar or type java -jar stendhal-0.83.jar on a command window.
; Do you expect to make a ton of money from Stendhal?
; Do you expect to make a ton of money from Stendhal?
: No, Stendhal is unoficially a [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Non-profit_organization non-profit] project. This means that, while in some future the project could have to resort to [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Web_banner advertisement-based revenue] or [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Merchandising#Licensing merchandising] to pay for the [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Internet_hosting_service hosting service] for the official server, these earnings would be only used for this purpose and not distributed to individuals. Fortunately, for the time being, this cost is covered by a generous person's donation.
: No, Stendhal is unofficially a [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Non-profit_organization non-profit] project. This means that, while in some future the project could have to resort to [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Web_banner advertisement-based revenue] or [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Merchandising#Licensing merchandising] to pay for the [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Internet_hosting_service hosting service] for the official server, these earnings would be only used for this purpose and not distributed to individuals. Fortunately, for the time being, this cost is covered by a generous person's donation.
; Have you considered offering premium content or premium accounts as an alternative method of revenue?
; Have you considered offering premium content or premium accounts as an alternative method of revenue?
: Yes. And it is rejected because it is commonly thought that [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gameplay gameplay] should give equal opportunities to all players instead of favoring some of them for the money they paid.
: Yes. And it is rejected because it is commonly thought that [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gameplay gameplay] should give equal opportunities to all players instead of favoring some of them for the money they paid.