Talk:StendhalRefactoringRP: Difference between revisions

Jump to navigation Jump to search
Content deleted Content added
imported>Suppenkasper
mNo edit summary
imported>Suppenkasper
mNo edit summary
 
(17 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown)
Line 9: Line 9:
According to the formula max_defence gets subtracted from max_attack and also divides (8 * max_attack * random[0..1] - max_defense * random[0..1]). So it decreases the damage.
According to the formula max_defence gets subtracted from max_attack and also divides (8 * max_attack * random[0..1] - max_defense * random[0..1]). So it decreases the damage.


damage = (8 * max_attack * random[0..1] - max_defence * random[0..1]) / max_defence);
''damage = (8 * max_attack * random[0..1] - max_defence * random[0..1]) / max_defence);''


If I interpreted this correctly the source[Armor] changes the max_defence value of the attacked target. This makes me wonder why, because I don't see any connection between the defensive equipment the character wears and the max_defence value of the target. The better the character's equipment (Armor, Helmet, Legs, Boots, Shield, Cloak) is the higher is the target's defence? I believe it should be target[ARMOR] instead but as mentioned in the article there doesn't seem to be a target[ARMOR] value for creatures.
If I interpreted this correctly the source[Armor] changes the max_defence value of the attacked target. This makes me wonder why, because I don't see any connection between the defensive equipment the character wears and the max_defence value of the target. The better the character's equipment (Armor, Helmet, Legs, Boots, Shield, Cloak) is the higher is the target's defence? I believe it should be target[ARMOR] instead but as mentioned in the article there doesn't seem to be a target[ARMOR] value for creatures.
Line 18: Line 18:




Btw, the last closing bracket in the damage formula should also be removed since there is no opening bracket to it.
Btw, the last closing bracket in the damage formula should be removed since there is no opening bracket to it.