Ideas for Stendhal/Item Deterioration: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added

Revision as of 19:00, 15 February 2014 view source imported>Madmetzger No edit summary ← Older edit		Latest revision as of 22:52, 19 June 2018 view source imported>AntumDeluge m AntumDeluge moved page Stendhal/ideas/Item Deterioration to Ideas for Stendhal/Item Deterioration over redirect: Undoing previous move
(12 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown)
Line 11: ==Lifetime of items== One of the main questions while implementing damaging of items is how long an item should live. A too short lifetime will be too annoying for players whereas a too long lifetime will be of no effect for the economy in Stendhal. Therefore answering this question is an important step towards implementation of item deterioration. ~~How long should an item be usable? Should it break completely?~~ {{TODO\|Gather data about average session length and fights}} {{TODO\|Discuss breaking vs. not breaking, further effects on damaged items?}} ==Repair Prices== How much should a player pay for a repair? What are the factors involved for price calculation? Line 22 ⟶ 27: ==Further Reading== * [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Geometric_distribution Geometric distribution on Wikipedia] == Notes == If this is implemented, I think it would be a good idea to have a argument for the server where item deterioration can be disabled. That way, someone running their own custom server can choose to have this option. - <player>deluge\|AntumDeluge</player>