Talk:Stendhal graphics copyright: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Content deleted Content added
imported>Herodot Is the gpl the right licence for images? |
imported>AntumDeluge m AntumDeluge moved page Talk:Stendhal:graphics copyright to Talk:Stendhal graphics copyright: Don't use "Stendhal" namespace for compatibility reasons |
||
| (26 intermediate revisions by 5 users not shown) | |||
| Line 5: | Line 5: | ||
I'm not sure about those legal things so correct me if I'm wrong. I think the gpl is not applicabe to graphics and they should be licenced with the GNU FDL as shown on the bottom of this page. |
I'm not sure about those legal things so correct me if I'm wrong. I think the gpl is not applicabe to graphics and they should be licenced with the GNU FDL as shown on the bottom of this page. |
||
:GFDL is more appropriate than GPL for images. Other licenses of note include the [http://artlibre.org/licence/lal/en/ Free Art License], any of several listed on [http://creativecommons.org/about/licenses/ Creative Commons], and of course good ol' public domain. --[[User:GreyKnight|GreyKnight]] 10:25, 16 September 2006 (PDT) |
|||
: Please note that we are not allowed to distribute GFDL content as the GPL requires that everything linked is GPL. --[[User:Hendrik Brummermann|Hendrik Brummermann]] 02:27, 17 September 2006 (PDT) |
|||
: Perhaps we should encourage contributers to dual license their contributions(if they aren't already doing Public Domain / BSD Style), just in case? --[[User:Seather|Seather]] 22:05, 30 June 2007 (PDT) |
|||